Biotechnology and Sciences Chemical and Materials Engineering and Designs High Tech and Electrical Trade Mark and Domain Names
Find an expert by name If you know the name of the attorney you need, start here.
Patents Drafting Filing and prosecution Infringement and validity Opposition and appeal Strategy View all
Trade marks Dispute management Domain names Enforcement Filing and prosecution Licences and assignments Search analysis Strategy View all
Design Infringement and validity Registration View all
Support Online services Records and renewals Searching and watching BoultRenew View all
People
Find an expert by name If you know the name of the attorney you need, start here.
Find an expert by group Choose a group to learn more about the team and how to contact us.
Sign up to our updates
Signing up means you can keep on top of the latest IP updates and publications from our attorneys.
Click here to sign upTrainee Is this firm right for me? Community, diversity and inclusion Graduate training programme Join us Talk to us
Current vacancies
We have some great opportunities right now at Boult Wade Tennant.
View all vacanciesWhat Is Two-Part Form?
A European Examiner will typically object that a European patent application will not meet the formal requirements of the European Patent Convention unless the independent claims are placed in “two-part form”.
Two-part form is the division of an independent claim into a preamble and a characterising portion. The preamble is the opening portion of the claim. The preamble of a claim includes those features that are acknowledged as being known in combination in the closest prior art document. The preamble is followed by the words “characterised in that” or “characterised by”, and then the claim concludes with the characterising portion. The characterising portion includes those features that are novel over the closest prior art document, and indicate the inventive contribution of the claim.
Is there a downside to two-part form, and is it always required?
Two-part form is not a legally-binding acknowledgement of the lack of novelty of the features of the preamble. However, depending on the circumstances, applicants sometimes find it undesirable.
Although a European Examiner will almost always request two-part form, and this is usually appropriate, it is in fact not always necessary. The implementing regulations make clear that two-part form should be used “wherever appropriate”. Therefore, the Examiner can insist on two-part form unless it can be shown that it is inappropriate given the circumstances of the particular case.
It is possible to show that two-part form is inappropriate when it can be established that it would give a misleading picture of the invention or of the prior art. Therefore, should it be a concern to you, your Representative can consider whether any arguments may be put forward to challenge the Examiner’s request that two-part form be used for your application.
Author