Boult Wade Tennant
Home

Expertise

What does client service mean to us? It means developing custom relationships, sharing our technical expertise, and providing practical solutions delivered by pragmatic IP professionals who are easy to work with. We carefully structure our teams to ensure that we have the right blend of knowledge and experience to meet the unique needs of each client. Regardless of the industry in which you operate, our patent, design and trade mark specialists will quickly understand your business and your IP issues, with the addition of significant value right from the start of the working relationship.

EXPERTISE
image

"They are a very bright, thoughtful bunch and are easy to work with. Their advice is timely, comprehensive, commercial and very sound."

Client quote, Chambers and Partners

Careers

We are a people business. To deliver exceptional service to our clients, we seek individuals with a combination of talent, commercial awareness, and integrity. Our clients depend on our expertise – but they also appreciate our individual personalities and our collaborative way of working. Within a supportive working environment, we empower our staff to strive for excellence. We recognise that when our employees reach their full potential, our firm also succeeds.

CAREERS

Insights

27-29 September Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Trademark Administrators & Practitioners (TMAP) Meeting

Partners Gillian Farmer and Dr Isabel Blanco are attending the 2026 Trademark Administrators & Practitioners (TMAP) Meeting in Baltimore, Maryland.

The patent race in solid-state batteries: what battery start-ups need to know

As solid-state battery patent filings surge, start-ups must protect innovation while managing freedom-to-operate risks. Discover how a robust IP strategy can support investment, growth and commercial

A reminder to check texts proposed for grant carefully (T 0216/26)

A recent EPO Board of Appeal decision confirms that applicants can correct errors in grant texts through appeal, but may still have to pay the appeal fee if they failed to identify the mistake earlier

Sufficiency of alternatives within a claim (T 1186/24)

A recent EPO appeal decision highlights the risks of claim alternatives, confirming that each alternative must independently meet sufficiency requirements.

INSIGHTS