Biotechnology and Sciences Chemical and Materials Engineering and Designs High Tech and Electrical Trade Mark and Domain Names
Find an expert by name If you know the name of the attorney you need, start here.
Patents Drafting Filing and prosecution Infringement and validity Opposition and appeal Strategy View all
Trade marks Dispute management Domain names Enforcement Filing and prosecution Licences and assignments Search analysis Strategy View all
Design Infringement and validity Registration View all
Support Online services Records and renewals Searching and watching BoultRenew View all
People
Find an expert by name If you know the name of the attorney you need, start here.
Find an expert by group Choose a group to learn more about the team and how to contact us.
Sign up to our updates
Signing up means you can keep on top of the latest IP updates and publications from our attorneys.
Click here to sign upTrainee Is this firm right for me? Community, diversity and inclusion Graduate training programme Join us Talk to us
Current vacancies
We have some great opportunities right now at Boult Wade Tennant.
View all vacanciesEmployee Inventions
The UK Patents Act sets out circumstances in which an invention made by an employee will be taken to belong to his/her employer. The circumstances are if:
A common example of case (i) above arises for scientists and engineers having a contract of employment for research and/or development in the UK.
Directors, partners or sole company owners are good examples of case (ii) above as they are often considered to meet the “special obligation” requirement. This is true even if, strictly speaking, they are not “employed” by the “employing” company.
The provisions apply to employees who are employed in the UK, employed mainly in the UK, or if the employee’s place of employment cannot be determined but the employer has a place of business in the UK to which the employee was attached.
Is there a requirement to provide inventor compensation in the UK?
The Patents Act has provisions for an employee to seek compensation from his employer through the Patents Court or the Patent Office if the employee believes a fair reward has not been given for an invention. To be successful, an employee must show that the invention has provided an outstanding benefit and the invention was something that would not normally be expected to arise from the employee’s duties. Case Law suggests that a high threshold is applied when determining whether the benefit is “outstanding”, and this can only apply to something truly out of the ordinary when looked at in the total context of the employer’s activities.
Is the situation different for employees in other countries?
Although the right to the invention is taken to belong to the employer for employees in the UK, other countries have different provisions regarding employee inventions. For example, in the United States of America the situation is different such that an employee is usually required to complete an assignment document to transfer rights to the employer. Requirements for inventor compensation also differ between jurisdictions.
Author