Boult Wade Tennant
People » Dr Simon Binnie

Dr Simon Binnie

Partner

Reading

Contact
v-card Download V-card
Address
Memberships
  • AIPLA (Committee member, Electronic and Computer Law Committee)
  • CIPA (Committee member, Computer Technologies Committee)
  • EPI
  • IPOA (Committee member, Software Related Inventions Committee)
  • Institute of Physics
Qualifications
  • Registered UPC Representative
  • European Patent Attorney
  • Chartered Patent Attorney
  • Certificate in Intellectual Property Law, Queen Mary University of London
  • PhD Physics, University College London
  • MSci Theoretical Physics, University College London

As a Partner in the Boult AI team it is exciting to witness the AI revolution up-close, as inventors have embraced the power of AI/ML techniques.

My practice spans many application fields, from cryptography and telecoms, through bioinformatics and genetic genealogy, via scientific instruments and computer hardware – the common thread being the ubiquity of AI/ML techniques at the cutting-edge of innovation. As a former computational and theoretical physicist, it’s fascinating to peek inside the ML models underpinning ML innovation (some of which pleasingly borrow techniques from my former field) and grapple with the myriad of legal issues ML innovation can encounter.

Indeed, as an academic I experienced first-hand the power of ML techniques to help solve complex mathematical problems and model systems where our physical understanding may be limited. This included the use of techniques familiar in the ML space, such as importance sampling and the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. Whilst these techniques often aided in solving the underlying first-principles calculations, I also witnessed the rise of neural network-based techniques tackle the first principles problems head on, as part of their journey to become the Swiss Army Knife of applied mathematics.

As always legal change trails technological revolution and in the AI/ML space it is both fascinating and exciting in equal measure to be at the frontier of this. Clients need advice that not only reflects how the patent system handles AI/ML innovation now, but also has an eye on what the legal position might look like in a decade’s time. I am proud to be able to assist my clients in this ever-changing landscape and, like all of us in the Boult AI team, never lose focus of the underlaying aim – protecting the client’s valuable innovation.

With the rise of the large language models, amongst other things, ensuring that the amazing possibilities that AI/ML techniques enable are more widely known, one can only imagine that the pace of innovation will become even quicker. I look forward to what the coming years and decades will bring and know that our team here at Boult will continue to lead the way in the protection of the AI/ML IP yet to come – providing the right blend of practical and imaginative advice to ensure the best possible IP protection.

Recent experience

Assisting a growing UK defence systems developer establish a portfolio of applications directed towards its innovative AI technology.

Acting for a multinational telecommunications company in the preparation and prosecution of digital processing systems patents.

Aiding in the successful defence against an opposition, and so maintaining a medical device European patent for the client in the face of an initially negative opinion by the opposition division around complex legal issues of priority.

Acting for a multinational content protection and video streaming technology company in relation to the prosecution of patents for content protection and stenographic content tracing techniques at the transport stream and elementary stream levels.

Providing detailed opinions and prosecution strategies for the European portfolio of a large bioinformatics company, doing genetic and genealogical analysis. I have helped navigate the applications through the EPO process where local restrictions around excluded subject-matter can be in play from many different directions – often without clear case law guidance due to the pioneering and cross-disciplinary nature of the field.

Acting for a large multinational software and data security company with strategic and practical assistance in its worldwide patent portfolio, along with helping build the portfolio through extensive drafting and prosecution work.

Relevant Search Terms
Recommended Sites
Suggested Media
Recognitions
Additional Info
Languages
“I am proud to be able to assist my clients in this ever-changing landscape and, like all of us in the Boult AI team, never lose focus of the underlaying aim – protecting the client’s valuable innovation.”
Sector Experience
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
Automotive
  • Autonomous vehicles
Communications and Networks
  • Cloud computing
  • Internet of things (IOT)
  • Wired and wireless networks
Computing and Software
  • Bioinformatics
  • Blockchain and distributed ledgers
  • Communications and networks
  • Computer games
  • Data and software security, cryptography and digital rights management (DRM)
  • Data management and storage, databases and data compression
  • Digital assistants, virtual assistants and software agents
  • Fintech and adtech
  • Machine vision
  • Metaverse, virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR)
  • Multimedia, audio/video processing and animation
  • Natural language processing
  • Quantum computing
  • Robotic process automation
  • Search engines
  • Signal processing
  • Software applications and systems, mobile applications, user interfaces
Electronics and Electrical Devices
  • Computer and IT architecture and system design
  • Medical devices
  • Optics
  • Robotics
  • Scientific instruments
  • Semiconductor devices
  • Testing systems, control systems, signal processing
  • Wearable tech and human interfaces

As a Partner in the Boult AI team it is exciting to witness the AI revolution up-close, as inventors have embraced the power of AI/ML techniques.

My practice spans many application fields, from cryptography and telecoms, through bioinformatics and genetic genealogy, via scientific instruments and computer hardware – the common thread being the ubiquity of AI/ML techniques at the cutting-edge of innovation. As a former computational and theoretical physicist, it’s fascinating to peek inside the ML models underpinning ML innovation (some of which pleasingly borrow techniques from my former field) and grapple with the myriad of legal issues ML innovation can encounter.

Indeed, as an academic I experienced first-hand the power of ML techniques to help solve complex mathematical problems and model systems where our physical understanding may be limited. This included the use of techniques familiar in the ML space, such as importance sampling and the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. Whilst these techniques often aided in solving the underlying first-principles calculations, I also witnessed the rise of neural network-based techniques tackle the first principles problems head on, as part of their journey to become the Swiss Army Knife of applied mathematics.

As always legal change trails technological revolution and in the AI/ML space it is both fascinating and exciting in equal measure to be at the frontier of this. Clients need advice that not only reflects how the patent system handles AI/ML innovation now, but also has an eye on what the legal position might look like in a decade’s time. I am proud to be able to assist my clients in this ever-changing landscape and, like all of us in the Boult AI team, never lose focus of the underlaying aim – protecting the client’s valuable innovation.

With the rise of the large language models, amongst other things, ensuring that the amazing possibilities that AI/ML techniques enable are more widely known, one can only imagine that the pace of innovation will become even quicker. I look forward to what the coming years and decades will bring and know that our team here at Boult will continue to lead the way in the protection of the AI/ML IP yet to come – providing the right blend of practical and imaginative advice to ensure the best possible IP protection.

Recent experience

Assisting a growing UK defence systems developer establish a portfolio of applications directed towards its innovative AI technology.

Acting for a multinational telecommunications company in the preparation and prosecution of digital processing systems patents.

Aiding in the successful defence against an opposition, and so maintaining a medical device European patent for the client in the face of an initially negative opinion by the opposition division around complex legal issues of priority.

Acting for a multinational content protection and video streaming technology company in relation to the prosecution of patents for content protection and stenographic content tracing techniques at the transport stream and elementary stream levels.

Providing detailed opinions and prosecution strategies for the European portfolio of a large bioinformatics company, doing genetic and genealogical analysis. I have helped navigate the applications through the EPO process where local restrictions around excluded subject-matter can be in play from many different directions – often without clear case law guidance due to the pioneering and cross-disciplinary nature of the field.

Acting for a large multinational software and data security company with strategic and practical assistance in its worldwide patent portfolio, along with helping build the portfolio through extensive drafting and prosecution work.

Relevant Search Terms
Recommended Sites
Suggested Media
Recognitions
Additional Info

Insights

image
Trending Topic

The normalization and regulation of AI – IP protection now that AI has hit the mainstream

More
image
Bulletin

Regression toward the mean: UK Court of Appeal looks for harmony with the European Patent Office on Artificial Neural Networks

More
image
Bulletin

How to register AI patents in Asia-Pacific and Europe: the dos and don’ts

More
image
Bulletin

“Just one more thing…” – UK IPO appeals recent UK High Court decision on patentability of artificial neural networks in the UK

More
image
Bulletin

“It’s been emotional” – UK IPO AI guidelines temporarily suspended and new statutory guidance on artificial neural networks following decision from the UK High Court

More
image
Bulletin

The normalization and regulation of AI – IP protection now that AI has hit the mainstream

More
image
Bulletin

The art of the possible – UKIPO publishes its AI patent guidelines.

More
image
Bulletin

AI inventorship in the UK – Consultation says “no”.

More
image
Bulletin

AI inventorship: snakes and ladders at the Australian courts.

More
image
Bulletin

In-Person Oral Proceedings are the Gold-Standard

More
image
Bulletin

Trick or Treat? UK Government asks for views on AI inventorship

More
image
Bulletin

AI inventorship: dissent at the UK Court of Appeal?

More
image
Bulletin

Patentability of simulations – Decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal for G1/19.

More
INSIGHTS