Boult Wade Tennant
People » Jay Janusz

Jay Janusz

Patent Attorney

London

Contact
v-card Download V-card
Address
Memberships
Qualifications

Registered UPC Representative
European Patent Attorney
Chartered Patent Attorney
Certificate in Intellectual Property Law, Queen Mary University of London
MPhys (Hons) Physics, University of Nottingham

With my background in physics, a career as a Patent Attorney feels like a perfect crossroads of  my academic work, writing acumen and language skills. I am a European Patent Attorney and Chartered Patent Attorney at Boult, and part of our AI team.

My work with AI clients mainly involves preparing arguments to the European Patent Office. Prosecution of AI patent applications can involve a heavier focus on explaining why the invention has technical character and you really need to work to convince some patent offices that there is something “more” going on than just maths – that the invention is, in fact, technical.

As is becoming increasingly apparent, AI has the potential to transform many different industries and create new opportunities, which makes it an exciting and dynamic field. Working with AI clients (or clients branching into AI) opens up the possibility of helping to shape the future of the law around this technology.

There is quite some controversy (both in the intellectual property sector and outside it) around the use of AI to generate or modify IP, which I find fascinating. For example, recently, a number of patent applications were filed designating an AI (known as DABUS) as the inventor. Artists are also currently concerned about the use of AI to generate art – particularly whether use of existing art in training datasets may infringe their IP rights. This is another complicated subject that may require a detailed understanding of copyright law to determine whether an AI can create an “original” work and whether a “substantial part” of another artist’s work appears in the AI-generated art. I am eager to see how the law may develop as these issues begin to be investigated.

Recent experience
Publications
Relevant Search Terms
Recommended Sites
Suggested Media
Recognitions
Additional Info
Languages
“Prosecution of AI patent applications can have a heavier focus on explaining why the invention has technical character and you really need to work to convince some patent offices that there is something “more” going on than just maths – that the invention is, in fact, technical.”
Sector Experience
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
Communications and Networks
  • Cloud computing
  • Internet of things (IOT)
  • Wired and wireless networks
Computing and Software
  • Blockchain and distributed ledgers
  • Data and software security, cryptography and digital rights management (DRM)
  • Data management and storage, databases and data compression
  • Multimedia, audio/video processing and animation
  • Natural language processing
  • Quantum computing
  • Signal processing
  • Software applications and systems, mobile applications, user interfaces
Electronics and Electrical Devices
  • Scientific instruments
  • Semiconductor devices

With my background in physics, a career as a Patent Attorney feels like a perfect crossroads of  my academic work, writing acumen and language skills. I am a European Patent Attorney and Chartered Patent Attorney at Boult, and part of our AI team.

My work with AI clients mainly involves preparing arguments to the European Patent Office. Prosecution of AI patent applications can involve a heavier focus on explaining why the invention has technical character and you really need to work to convince some patent offices that there is something “more” going on than just maths – that the invention is, in fact, technical.

As is becoming increasingly apparent, AI has the potential to transform many different industries and create new opportunities, which makes it an exciting and dynamic field. Working with AI clients (or clients branching into AI) opens up the possibility of helping to shape the future of the law around this technology.

There is quite some controversy (both in the intellectual property sector and outside it) around the use of AI to generate or modify IP, which I find fascinating. For example, recently, a number of patent applications were filed designating an AI (known as DABUS) as the inventor. Artists are also currently concerned about the use of AI to generate art – particularly whether use of existing art in training datasets may infringe their IP rights. This is another complicated subject that may require a detailed understanding of copyright law to determine whether an AI can create an “original” work and whether a “substantial part” of another artist’s work appears in the AI-generated art. I am eager to see how the law may develop as these issues begin to be investigated.

Recent experience
Publications
Relevant Search Terms
Recommended Sites
Suggested Media
Recognitions
Additional Info

Insights

image
Trending Topic

Boult’s 101 guide to green technology-related IP rights

More
image
Bulletin

Fast track patent programmes for green technology

More
INSIGHTS