Boult Wade Tennant
/bulletin

Archives: Bulletins

November 27, 2024

UPC decides on first doctrine of equivalents case

The first Unified Patent Court (UPC) decision (Plant-e v. Arkyne) discussing the doctrine of equivalents has recently published. In the decision, the

November 25, 2024

UPC Court of Appeal clarifies when Opt-Outs can be validly withdrawn

Summary In a decision dated 12 November 2024 the Court of Appeal (“CoA”) of the Unified Patent Court has clarified that Art.

November 12, 2024

“Clean label” foods

Only a decade ago, the primary focus of patents in the food industry seemed to be on increasing yields or producing the

November 1, 2024

European Council approves revised designs protection package

The Council of the European Union has recently adopted two legislative acts under the design package: a revised directive on legal protection

October 31, 2024

EU AI Pact – A preview to the success of the Act itself?

Back in 2023, we reported on the European Parliament passing the EU AI Act. Over a year later, on 1 August 2024,

October 29, 2024

Benchmarking new brands – a case of lookalikes

Benchmarking is commonplace within the retail market. This is the process in which a company compares its products and methods with those of the most successful companies in

October 22, 2024

“Blanding”- the loss of value in fashion logos

What is “Blanding”? Blanding is the paradox of branding: it refers to the repetitive and growing trend of brands adopting similar minimalist

October 16, 2024

T56/21 – No legal basis for requiring description amendments

Key points Last year, my colleague Ross Chapman reported the latest on the ongoing description amendments saga at the EPO (link). This

September 25, 2024

European Inventor Awards 2024 – A celebration of women in Life Sciences

The European Patent Office (EPO) annually recognises exceptional individuals whose inventions are making a significant contribution across sectors to drive technological progress,

September 18, 2024

Preliminary Opinion on G 1/23

Previous case G1/92 referred questions to the Enlarged Board of Appeal regarding whether the chemical composition of a product is made available