1 May, 2015
Rachel Conroy, Trade Mark Attorney at Boult Wade Tennant, describes the dissent arising from a proposed cosmetic mark in a recent article for ITMA Review, the Institute of Trade Mark Attorneys’ (ITMA) journal. Read further here about how the judgement in Lumene Oy v OHIM highlights the importance of precision when filing an appeal as well as the need to fully substantiate any argument with evidence.
This article was first published in the March/April 2015 issue of the ITMA Review, the journal of the Institute of Trade Mark Attorneys (ITMA). For more information on ITMA, please visit www.itma.org.uk/