|
|||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
||||||||||
![]() |
![]()
April 2005 Flights of fancy
In a recent passing-off case in the High Court, the judge decided that the claimant enjoyed a notable reputation and goodwill in its mark PENTATHLON, but that there was no misrepresentation being made by the defendant when selling the same goods under the identical trade mark. The decision rested on the particular facts of the case. Whilst there were several parties involved, essentially the claimant was the successor to a business called The House of Darts which, from 1987, marketed dart flights under the PENTATHLON trade mark in the UK. From 1987 to mid 2003, these dart flights were supplied by the defendant exclusively to the House of Darts business. There was never any formal agreement between the parties and neither business ever attempted to register the PENTATHLON trade mark. When the relationship between the claimant and the defendant broke down in 2003, the defendant started supplying dart flights marked with PENTATHLON to other wholesalers. Pertinent facts in the case were as follows:
|
![]() |
|
||||||||
Contact: tel +44(0)20 7430 7500 boult@boult.com |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||